[Moon plb]

I completely agree—cybersecurity for critical infrastructure can’t be treated as an afterthought. The stakes are simply too high. A single breach in healthcare, energy, or finance could ripple across entire communities. Strong frameworks, skilled professionals, and next-gen tools are non-negotiable, but so is cross-sector collaboration. Sharing intelligence between organizations and governments is key to staying ahead of evolving threats. It’s not just about technology—it’s about collective resilience.

https://insuredirect.com/life-and-health-agent-eo-insurance/

insuredirect.com

Life & Health Agents E&O Insurance | Insuredirect

Get reliable Life & Health Agents E&O Insurance to safeguard against client claims and errors. Fast, affordable protection tailored for insurance professionals.

[Moon plb]

Great question! I usually send out quick email alerts or SMS updates for urgent vulnerabilities, followed by a detailed advisory within 24 hours. For high-risk clients, a call works best. Using automation tools also helps streamline the process. Clear, non-technical language is key to ensuring clients actually act on it.

[Moon plb]

Interesting question! As AI use grows, liability risks do too. Some tech E&O (Errors & Omissions) or cyber liability insurance policies may cover damages from AI-generated misinformation, depending on how it’s used. But most policies aren’t tailored yet. It’s a gray area—insurers are still figuring it out. Definitely something worth watching as regulations evolve.

[Moon plb]

Great point—bridging that gap is key, especially for SMEs that often lack formal risk documentation. I’ve seen success through pre-proposal risk assessments and tailored reports that speak insurers’ language. Building relationships with underwriters also helps. Would love to hear others’ experiences—what tools or approaches have worked best for you?

[Moon plb]

That’s a great update! I haven’t seen many carriers explicitly address AI-driven social engineering yet, so Coalition’s move is pretty significant. It’ll be interesting to see if others follow suit. Given the rise in deepfake scams and phishing, this kind of endorsement could become essential in cyber policies soon.

[Moon plb]

Thank you, Ferdinand, for your thoughtful and well-structured response. Your two-tiered approach to threats is very practical, especially the balance between relevance and overload when informing clients. The decision to only alert when a fix or mitigation exists makes sense—it builds trust. Also, your emphasis on actionable insights rather than noise is something we should all adopt. Really appreciate your input!